Can Alberta Go It Alone?

The Canadian province of Alberta could hold a public referendum on breaking away from Canada next year if a citizen-led petition gets the required number of signatures, the province’s Premiere Danielle Smith said on Monday.

Alberta is a key driver of Canada's economy

Smith said that the Albertan government will not push a vote on separating from Canada, and that she personally does not support separation. But she asserted: “requesting such a question to be put on a referendum, our government will respect the democratic process and include that question on the 2026 provincial referendum ballot.”

Alberta is a western Canadian province with a population of roughly 5 million which borders on the U.S. state of Montana. The area is known for its vast oil and natural gas reserves, while mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction make up the largest proportion of the province’s economy.

Alberta is a key driver of Canada's economy. It’s the leading producer of fossil fuels for the nation, accounting for 84% of total crude oil production and 61% of total natural gas production in 2023. In 2024 Alberta was second only to Ontario in terms of GDP growth. Its per capita GDP is the highest among the Canadian provinces.

The data just mentioned is the primary reason why Ottawa will vigorously resist any serious effort by Alberta to secede. It will not want to sever the “tail which wags the dog.”

The province is also considered a conservative stronghold. Smith belongs to the United Conservative Party, which has led the provincial government since 2019 and advocates for lower taxes and against a carbon tax. Alberta under Smith has challenged federal net-zero emissions timelines and clean energy regulations.

Under Liberal leadership for a decade, Ottawa has blocked pipelines, canceled multiple oil and gas projects, and introduced a carbon tax--policies that Smith described as “anti-energy, anti-agriculture, and anti-resource development.”

The Clarity Act

Most Albertans, according to a May 1 poll by Ottawa-based Nanos Research, believe that staying with Canada would be better for the economy. Only 1 in 10 respondents said that the province would be better off as part of the U.S.

Only one province, however, has actually held referenda on separating from Canada: Quebec, in 1980 and 1995, both of which showed a majority of Québécois preferred to stay with Canada.

The western province has long clashed with the federal government over legislation limiting fossil fuel development and promoting clean energy, which Alberta officials say unfairly targets their economy. Smith’s announcement comes days after the Liberal Party secured a fourth consecutive term in the federal election, deepening political divides between Ottawa and oil-rich Alberta.

Following the election, the Alberta Prosperity Project launched a petition calling for a referendum on the province’s independence.

“Should Ottawa, for whatever reason, continue to attack our province as they have done over the last decade? Ultimately that will be for Albertans to decide,” Smith said.

Recently, Smith’s government also introduced legislation to lower the threshold for referendums initiated by citizen petition. The bill reduces the number of signatures needed from 20% to 10% of eligible voters from the last provincial election and extends the collection period from 90 to 120 days. In order to pass the threshold, a petition would need about 177,000 signatures.

But leaving is not as easy as voting in favor of a referendum. Canada’s constitution does not allow unilateral separation. Following the unsuccessful referenda on separation in Quebec, the federal government enacted the Clarity Act in 2000 on how to approach future referenda on provinces seeking independence from the country.

The Devil is in the detail

The act stipulates that the national parliament’s House of Commons determines if the referendum on a province’s independence demonstrates “a clear expression of a will by a clear majority” of the provincial population. Once determined, the provincial government can then negotiate with the federal government to amend the Canadian constitution to potentially allow its secession. 

As the saying goes: the Devil is in the details.

Alberta doesn’t appear to want special treatment; it merely seeks to be free to develop its resources and choose how to provide healthcare and education. Many in the western province hope secession will not be necessary--that Alberta’s government will be able to reach a meaningful agreement with Prime Minister Mark Carney and Canada’s new government.

Last week, Carney’s Liberal Party retained power after a campaign that focused heavily on what he called the existential threat posed by US President Donald Trump, who has floated the idea of Canada becoming the 51st US state and imposed extensive tariffs on most of its neighbor’s goods.

The outcome of the election has added to long-running tensions in conservative regions. In Alberta, where the Conservatives won 34 out of 37 seats, many residents have expressed frustration with their federal leadership. Similar dissatisfaction has been reported in neighboring Saskatchewan, and until recently to a lesser extent in British Columbia.

We must not forget that prior to Donald Trump and his rhetoric, Canadians were looking to the Conservative Party to rescue an economy that Trudeau and the Liberals had run into the ground. Let’s see how long the “knee-jerk” reaction of the electorate remains before Canadians realize--they over reacted.

Support Canada Free Press