Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
Founded in 2010 as a voice for freedom in Canada’s courtrooms, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF’s) mission is to defend the constitutional freedoms of Canadians through litigation and education.
Most Recent Articles by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms:
We hope this judicial rebuke will lead to more reasonable decisions by the government of Nova Scotia in the future
Seeking government censorship of a political leader’s public statements is an attack on the linchpin of Canada’s constitutional protection for free expression
The Western Standard will never intentionally lie to our readers to comply with a fictional right to not be offended. We will fight without compromise to protect the freedom of the press and freedom of speech against the censors;"
“I am accused of ‘hate speech’ and of breaching the BC Human Rights Code for challenging the concept of transgenderism and arguing that gender identity legislation harms women’s rights and safety, as well as youth;
Freedom of expression includes the right to hear: to listen to what others in our community value and believe, without fear;
A decision in this case could have wide-ranging implications for political expression across Ontario and Canada, particularly where governments seek to limit where and how citizens may communicate their views;
Justice Centre launches national petition to stop Bill C-22
March 21, 2026
This national petition calls upon all Members of Parliament to defeat Bill C-22 in the House of Commons;
While we are glad that the Township has heeded our legal warning regarding the prohibition on recording, the trespass notices against Mr. Hill and Mr. Carther have not yet been rescinded;
If Canadians want to remain a free people, informed consent must remain non-negotiable. No one should ever face pressure, suggestion, or expectation that death is the answer to suffering, disability, poverty, or inadequate healthcare;
Today’s ruling is a significant victory for the rule of law and for the principle that governments are bound by limits, even in moments of political pressure;
Trudeau government did not meet the high legal threshold required to invoke the Emergencies Act
Judge dismisses Crown’s attempt to forfeit Chris Barber’s truck
December 19, 2025
“Asset forfeiture is an extraordinary power, and it must not be used to punish Canadians for participating in peaceful protest;”
Court to decide whether Chris Barber loses his truck on Friday
December 18, 2025
Mr. Barber said, “I followed the directions I was given and did everything I could to act lawfully and peacefully.”
Support Canada Free Press
“This is a good day for the rule of law in BC. The Court of Appeal has confirmed that, like laws, court orders should be clear enough that we know how to comply with them.”
Many regulators have begun embedding political or ideological content into mandatory courses, codes of ethics and continuing education requirements;
Mr. Anisimov’s experience parallels that of many students and employees who faced deregistration or discipline for declining the Covid vaccines on religious grounds across Canada;
“‘Big Red’ is how I put food on the table. I followed every instruction police gave me during the protest, and I never imagined the government would try to take the very truck I rely on to earn a living;”
“We are disappointed that the Court declined to stay Mr. Blackman’s convictions"
New report warns Ottawa’s ‘nudge’ unit erodes democracy and public trust
November 20, 2025
If behavioural science is being used to influence public attitudes, then elected representatives—not unelected strategists—must set the boundaries;
“Freedom of expression includes the right to say nothing. The right not to speak is an important counterpart to free speech”
Mr. Barber relied in good faith on police and court direction during the protest. The principles of fairness and justice require that citizens not be punished for following the advice of authorities;
The case raises broader concerns about the use of human rights complaints by public officials to suppress criticism from ordinary citizens;
The matter will now proceed to a consultation hearing before the OLRB, where lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will present the full merits of the case;
Although this case arises in Nova Scotia, its implications are national in scope
"The College has chosen to punish me for statements that are not hateful, but truthful. I’m appealing because biological reality matters, and so does freedom of expression"
The letter cautions that if the province proceeds with “overbroad, arbitrary, and grossly disproportionate restrictions,” the province could face a legal challenge and be brought to heel in court
The Justice Centre commends Canada Galaxy Pageants for standing up for parental rights and the right of women and girls to access female-only safe spaces
NCN Banishment Law and roadside checkstop violated Mr. Francois’ constitutional rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
This ruling marks a significant step in what is believed to be the first criminal case in Canada involving a proposed Charter application based on the freezing of personal bank accounts under the Emergencies Act.